NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 2 Policy Proposal is an assessment that focuses on the development of a policy proposal for a healthcare issue that impacts patient care, an organization, or the nursing profession.
Policy and Practice Guidelines
All of this is necessary to handle the Hba1c test shortfall issue. These guidelines are important to meet the benchmark metric by Mercy Medical Center. Why is it necessary? Various reasons.
Foremost, this proposed policy ensures that every healthcare provider within a team or organization adopts the benchmark metrics through a standardized approach. This policy implementation aims to ensure that patients receive the same amount of care irrespective of the healthcare provider.
Secondly, the policy assessment can help identify why the required benchmarks for health care law and policy are not being met and what should be done to fix that.
NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 2
Just like Assessment 1 of Capella University, Assessment 2 ensures that the team or organization is compliant with the requirements related to staff duties, patient outcomes, and quality metrics. This does not just inform the team on policies and guidelines but also results in patient satisfaction.
Benchmark Underperformance Effects
Benchmark underperformance leads to crucial consequences for stakeholders and health organizations alike. The failure to meet Foot and Hba1c testing results in a lack of managing diabetic patients and adequate monitoring. This means decreased patient satisfaction, increased healthcare costs, and poor health outcomes.
The need for creating a policy for diabetes patients through evidence-based practice is to make sure the healthcare organizations are credible. The proposed policy and practice guidelines are for regulatory bodies, insurers, healthcare providers, stakeholder groups, and patients.
Summary of New Policy and Practice Guidelines
The organizational policy does not just guide staff training but also addresses shortfalls in meeting care plans. The evidence-based practice guidelines are around to ensure quality care for Mercy Medical Center’s Hgba1c testing and overall healthcare system.
These policy proposals and practice guidelines are not just for foot and hba1c evaluations but for staff training and awareness campaigns as well. This includes patient education programs for patients with glycated haemoglobin and general knowledge of foot and hba1c assessments.
Any good policy would involve environmental factors. The development and implementation of these factors include cultural beliefs, insurance coverage, and healthcare services. The policy proposal Mercy focuses on care law and policy professors to ensure that the benchmark metric prescribed is achieved.
Influence of Factors
Mercy Medical Center must have a routine foot and hba1c check to identify if the practice goes according to recommended practice guidelines. This reduces the risk of complications and leads to increased federal health care. Another point it focuses on is the guidelines for improving the care quality and reducing the rates of foot and hba1c.
Many adopt these evidence-based practice guidelines to improve targeted benchmark performance as well as emphasize hospital readmission reduction programs. The practice guidelines to address health care policies are as important as the access to care for hba1c tests and foot accessories.
Ethical Evidence-Based Practice Guideline
It is necessary to consider ethical principles such as justice, autonomy, non-maleficence, and beneficence. The provision of quality based on these elements does not just tackle the benchmark metric underperformance but ensures quality diabetes care and good results for stakeholders and groups involved.
The practice guidelines include patient-centred care, interdisciplinary care, regular monitoring, and patient education. These guidelines help establish a structured set of recommendations to improve the management of diabetic patients and other elements.
This provides points that are important to consider and provides the necessary solution for developing and implementing tips necessary to ensure quality care and reduce poor patient outcomes.
References
Abràmoff, M. D., Tobey, D., & Char, D. S. (2020). Lessons learned about autonomous AI: Finding a safe, efficacious, and ethical path through the development process. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 214, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.02.022
Basu, S., Garg, S., Sharma, N., & Singh, Mm. (2019). Improving the assessment of medication adherence: Challenges and considerations with a focus on low-resource settings. Tzu Chi Medical Journal, 31(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_177_18
Bevan, G., Evans, A., & Nuti, S. (2018). Reputations count: why benchmarking performance is improving health care across the world. Health Economics, Policy, and Law, 14(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744133117000561
Brown, A. F., Ma, G. X., Miranda, J., Eng, E., Castille, D., Brockie, T., Jones, P., Airhihenbuwa, C. O., Farhat, T., Zhu, L., & Trinh-Shevrin, C. (2019). Structural interventions to reduce and eliminate health disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 109(S1), S72–S78. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2018.304844
Carmienke, S., Fink, A., Baumert, J., Heidemann, C., Du, Y., Frese, T., & Heise, M. (2021). Participation in structured diabetes self-management education programs and its associations with self-management behavior – a nationwide population-based study. Patient Education and Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.017
Coe, I. R., Wiley, R., & Bekker, L.-G. (2019). Organizational best practices towards gender equality in science and medicine. The Lancet, 393(10171), 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)33188-x
Embuai, S., Tuasikal, H., & Siauta, M. (2019). Effect of foot exercise and care on peripheral vascular status in patients with diabetes mellitus. Repository.unar.ac.id.
https://repository.unar.ac.id/jspui/handle/123456789/558
Gottesman, O., Johansson, F., Komorowski, M., Faisal, A., Sontag, D., Doshi-Velez, F., & Celi, L. A. (2019). Guidelines for reinforcement learning in healthcare. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 16–18.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0310-5
Jindal, D., Roy, A., Ajay, V. S., Yadav, S. K., Prabhakaran, D., & Tandon, N. (2019). Strategies for stakeholder engagement and uptake of new intervention: Experience from the state-wide implementation of health technology for NCD care in Tripura, India. Global Heart, 14(2), 165.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2019.06.002
Juntunen, J. K., Halme, M., Korsunova, A., & Rajala, R. (2018). Strategies for integrating stakeholders into sustainability innovation: A configurational perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(3), 331–355.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12481
Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder engagement: Past, present, and future. Business & Society, 61(5), 0007650321106655. Sagepub.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211066595
Li, X., Krumholz, H. M., Yip, W., Cheng, K. K., De Maeseneer, J., Meng, Q., Mossialos, E., Li, C., Lu, J., Su, M., Zhang, Q., Xu, D. R., Li, L., Normand, S.-L. T., Peto, R., Li, J., Wang, Z., Yan, H., Gao, R., & Chunharas, S. (2020). Quality of primary health care in China: Challenges and recommendations. The Lancet, 395(10239), 1802–1812.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30122-7
Loureiro, S. M. C., Romero, J., & Bilro, R. G. (2019). Stakeholder engagement in co-creation processes for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study. Journal of Business Research.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.038
Phelan, A., McCormack, B., Dewing, J., Brown, D., Cardiff, S., Cook, N., Dickson, C., Kmete, S., Lorber, M., Magowan, R., McCance, T., Skovdahl, K., Štiglic, G., & van Lieshout, F. (2020). Review of developments in person-centred healthcare. International Practice Development Journal, 10(Suppl2), 1–29.
https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.10suppl2.003
Poger, J. M., Mayer, V., Duru, O. K., Nauman, B., Holderness, H., Warren, N., Vasquez, C., Bibi, S., Rasmussen-Torvik, L. J., Hosseinian, Z., Shi, L., Wallace, J., Goytia, C. N., Horowitz, C. R., & Kraschnewski, J. L. (2020). Network engagement in action. Medical Care, 58, S66–S74.
https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001264
Tan, H. Q. M., Chin, Y. H., Ng, C. H., Liow, Y., Devi, M. K., Khoo, C. M., & Goh, L. H. (2020). Multidisciplinary team approach to diabetes. An outlook on providers’ and patients’ perspectives. Primary Care Diabetes, 14(5), 545–551.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2020.05.012
van Crevel, R., & Critchley, J. A. (2021). The interaction of diabetes and tuberculosis: Translating research to policy and practice. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 6(1), 8.
https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6010008
Related Samples
No Plagiarism,No AI Top Grades Guaranteed