Death Penalty Thesis Statement | A Fair Capital Punishment?

Thesis Statement on Capital Punishment

The death penalty is not effective for small offences, yet you can use the death penalty to protect innocent people from capital crimes. 

Body

1. Instilling Fear

The psychological effect of fear is both a practical and useful approach. Losing your life means there are no turnarounds; this pushes off many potential criminals as it is not like life imprisonment or other sentences. The use of capital punishment reduces the numbers of rapists, terrorists, and murderers. 

Many criminologists agree that the application of the death penalty is an effective deterrent which values human life. The effectiveness of the death penalty cannot be denied, as it sends a strong message that the harshest penalties exist for severe crimes. 

2. Empirical Evidence Which Supports the Death Penalty

There are many arguments against the death penalty. They argue that we should have abolished the death penalty long ago as it is barbaric. There is empirical evidence suggesting the positive effect of capital punishment. There is a correlation between the reduction in crimes and a powerful justice system in favor of the death penalty. 

Certain researchers at Emory University concluded that the death penalty would be a fitting punishment for a crime of high degree. They argue that the imposition of the death penalty in society would see a drastic decrease in the homicide rate and many other crimes that violate the right to life.

3. Crime and Punishment and Justice

When a person is put to death, it creates an idea that there exists a system which honors the rule of ” an eye for an eye and life for a life. ” This is a path towards a healthy society. A society that knows the ethics of capital punishment and its support for the death penalty, also known as capital punishment, keeps everyone safe from becoming a victim of a violent crime.

All the arguments surrounding the death penalty – the arguments that are against the retention of the death penalty – are thoughtless. Whether the death penalty is barbaric or not is a separate issue; they should rather observe the positive effects of the death penalty. You did not just get rid of a violent criminal this way, but rather you saved the fundamental rights of so many potential victims.

4. Lessening Major Cases

The International Covenant on Civil Rights argue that the capital punishment policy should not be there to begin with. Their punishment theory suggests that a violent criminal must be detained and ‘worked upon’ until they are a better person. It shows their lack of understanding of the topic and how there is a decline in the number of violent crimes that are not just morally wrong but also socially unacceptable. 

They have an idea that the death penalty serves nothing. And it is rather an extreme approach to life and death. Their stance is full of inherent flaws and lacks the stomach for the right punishment. This is no justice to the innocent of the crime, to the victims of the crime.

Come to think of it, in the modern world, we do not have enough death penalty. Now, the topic of the death penalty itself is not often entertained. This is why we see the rise in violent crimes as the general public is not afraid of consequences. They know that the law would not hold them accountable for much; they do not live in fear of death. Hence, we see a rise in a society in dire need of balance.

5. Responsibility of the State

It is the moral, legal, and ethical responsibility of the state to give a final solution to this controversial issue. The state should implement the ultimate punishment to tackle violent crimes. The death by the state would solidify that the death penalty is inextricably effective and there is little to no ineffectiveness of death penalty.

The death penalty remains the only practical solution to violent crimes. We do not want the general public to believe that a person convicted of capital punishment does not deserve it. You do not want such a society where murderers and rapists and terrorists do not get what they deserve.

Conclusion

This thesis statement for death penalty shows that violent criminals must be sentenced to death. The write-up further explains why the arguments against the death penalty – or unfulfilled retribution – can cause more harm to society. You do not want to live in a society that cannot be exemplary for criminals of the highest degree. This is why this thesis statement on the death penalty is crucial and poses practical solutions.