Assignment Writer

Home / Free Samples / NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 4 Program Effectiveness Presentation

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 4 Program Effectiveness Presentation

 

Philosophical Ways to Evaluation 

Following are some of the most philosophical ways to evaluate nursing informatics courses:

DIKW Theory

Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom (DIKW) theory is accountable for collecting raw data to produce information. That information is compared against the evidence at hand to extract knowledge used to develop wisdom about relevant subjects. 

In this particular case, DIKW is integrated with the provision of wisdom, knowledge, information, and data for nursing informatics. The primary purpose here is to advance the knowledge about the utilization of technology associated with healthcare services.

Benner’s Model

This particular model categorizes learners as competent, proficient, experts, novices, and advanced beginners. It evaluates the learner’s ability to learn, understand, and remove problems based on their proficiency in nursing informatics.

This model states that new nurses who do not have enough knowledge of nursing informatics must improve the knowledge and skills required for the job. This is how you utilize the technology and deal with the assessment of nursing informatics courses.

Nurs Fpx 6111 Assessment 4 at Capella University

Formative assessments are required to assess the learner’s capacity to use technological advancements with integrated healthcare throughout the study. Summative assessment is used to identify the learner’s expertise after the nursing informatics course is completed. Both these assessments can be implemented to assess how much knowledge a learner has gained during their course.

Evidence of the Explanation

Formative assessment, summative assessment, Benner’s Model, and DIKW Theory to analyze, derive, and collect information about the use of technology with healthcare services. The combined model envisions providing knowledge to students about artificial intelligence (AI), EMR, automated IV pumps, and simulation-based healthcare services. These philosophical approaches to evaluation aim to assess the learning and often have positive results.

If there are gaps in the knowledge, then the students may not learn all the necessities they must. That means the healthcare services will not live up to the required standards and benchmarks. With proper care and service, there will be little to no knowledge gaps and that is all you need for the program to be successful. 

Evaluation Process

The nursing informatics evaluation process has the following steps:

Assessment 

Information is collected in this phase through survey forums and questionnaires. Students’ identities are kept anonymous while this process is ongoing. Such collection of data ensures all of this communication runs through a paper channel with close-ended answers to provide useful information.

Diagnosis

The collected data is then compiled to derive information about the course. It shows that the study documents compiled to extract information aim to develop ways concerning the provision of quality healthcare services.

Planning

The information from the diagnosis is used to come up with an analysis of how successful the course is. It derives the result of whether the course was able to provide quality care to students.

Implementation

After the study material and free samples, some amendments can be made. It is to ensure that shortcomings are removed and the course is successful at increasing the nurse’s psychomotor, effective, and cognitive domains.

Evaluation

Distributing questionnaires and survey forums among the students is how the program evaluation process is carried out. This step in the course definition and alignment table is there to verify if the changes made are beneficial throughout the course of nursing informatics.

These are the evaluation process steps that must be considered for the program to be safe and successful. If it weren’t for these evaluation steps, none of this would turn out to be for the betterment of students or the healthcare services.

Process Steps Limitations

The limitations of the process steps are:

  • A lack of students’ participation results in a lack of data availability.
  • Errors during the collection of data.
  • False implementation of tech during the collection of data (open-ended or close-ended questions).
  • The wrong use of analytical techniques or the use of wrong analytical techniques resulting in errors during the data analysis.
  • Poor skills for data evaluation including the wrong timing for evaluation programs (summative and formative assessments included).

Not to mention, there are limitations of the PDSA cycle as well such as:

  • Collection of data at a time when everyone is busy or not as invested as they should be.
  • No management of frequent data collection.

These limitations must be studied carefully. Only by knowing these limitations, we can work toward the improvement of the program. Evaluation of the program also shows how to overcome these limitations and fulfill the potential knowledge gap. Pay extra attention here whether you are a tutor or a learner.

Nurs Fpx 6111 Assessment 4 Program Effectiveness Presentation

 

Data Analysis for Program Improvements

Data analysis offers information needed in the program improvement of nursing informatics. This information would come up with tips about the ongoing exam regarding the status of the program. Frequent data collection will offer authentic information about the program which the Likert Scale assesses.

This is how you evaluate the learning of the learner. The purpose of learning is to make sure that the healthcare services do well. All of the information gathered and changes added, after numerous philosophical ways to deal with the situation, are only for the sake of the patients. This analysis, assessed by the Likert Scale, offers information about the effectiveness of the said program.

Knowledge Gaps

The sample papers and similar documents are there to cover knowledge gaps. Using close-ended questions in place of open-ended questions ends up scoring the collection of limited answers. Providing care to the patients is the vision of this program in nursing informatics. Knowledge in gaps might be applicable but it is not something feasible for the program. To assess the learning of the students, it is crucial to have no knowledge gap in between.

The completion of this program rests at the mercy of the students learning the important bits. They go through various templates to complete this assignment of theirs. The course’s learning is not as difficult. Even an average student’s ability level can ace the program knowledge.

References

Dammann O. (2019). Data, information, evidence, and knowledge: A proposal for health informatics and data science. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 10(3), e224. https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v10i3.9631

Hancock, P. A., & Volante, W. G. (2020). Quantifying the qualities of language. PloS One, 15(5), e0232198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232198

Paul, F., Abecassis, L., Freiberger, D., Hamilton, S., Kelly, P., Klements, E., LaGrasta, C., Lemire, L., O’Donnell, E., Patisteas, E., Phinney, C., Conwell, K., Saia, T., Whelan, K., Wood, L. J., & O’Brien, P. (2019). Competency-based professional advancement model for advanced practice RNs. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000719

Tseng, L. P., Hou, T. H., Huang, L. P., & Ou, Y. K. (2021). Effectiveness of applying clinical simulation scenarios and integrating information technology in medical-surgical nursing and critical nursing courses. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 229. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00744-7

Zann, A., Harwayne-Gidansky, L., & Maa, T. (2021). Incorporating simulation into your plan-do-study-act cycle. Pediatric Annals, 50(1), e25–e31. https://doi.org/10.3928/19382359-20201213-01

Related Samples

 

No Plagiarism,No AI Top Grades Guaranteed

No Plagiarism | No AI Top Grades Guaranteed

Get Instant Reply Within 30 Seconds