Health sciences and medicine (Task 1)

Introduction

Health and social care working in partnership extends to mean collaboration, working across boundaries of organization, profession, or individual to share expertise, resources, and decision-making power.

Partnership working in health and social care helps institutions like Aravind Eye Hospital accelerate the use of better provisioning of services, widen access to care, and further eye health innovation by providing essential healthcare services within India (Keerthana et al., 2024).

The essay attempts to discuss some of the features of partnership working in Aravind Eye Hospital, especially its collaboration with organizations, practitioners, colleagues, patients, and families from the outside.

Part A: Mind Map

 Part B: Key Elements of Partnership Working

External Organisations

Aravind Eye Hospital has received tremendous support from international organizations like WHO, and NGOs such as the Seva Foundation. The partnerships will provide access to global knowledge, technology, and resource base. Shared goals, such as the elimination of avoidable blindness by the hospital and external partners, ensure better management of resources and scaling up access to providing eye care to poor people (Krishnaveni, Joseph and Thulasiraj, 2023).

Other Practitioners

The hospital works in collaboration with the finest ophthalmologists, optometrists, and health professionals worldwide. These professional networks bring expertise and advice on best practice to the Aravind Eye Hospital. Training programs by collaboration and sharing of knowledge ensure that state-of-the-art ophthalmic care is achieved at the hospital (Lu et al., 2021).

Colleagues

The strong cooperation among inner colleagues-doctors, nurses, technicians, and administrators-is of vital importance in Aravind Eye Hospital for the purpose of providing quality care. Comprehensive treatment for the patients ensues from multidisciplinary teamwork. A further advantage of internal collaboration is its emphasis on operational efficiency in smooth processing of patient care and maintenance of the service standards (Balu et al., 2023).

Service Users

The reason for the success of Aravind hospital has been patient-centered care. Aravind Eye Hospital can involve its patients in decision-making processes regarding the options for their treatment, taking each patient’s autonomy into consideration while adjusting the care to the needs of each individual (WHO, 2023). This again can enhance the partnership and improve patient satisfaction and health outcomes.

Families

The involvement of families in the process of patient care is very important, particularly in post-operative care and support. Aravind engages the family through educating them on their role in recovery and equipping them with necessary knowledge to support their patient effectively (Nayak et al., 2023). Such a team approach in care ensures that continuity of care is maintained outside the hospital.

Part C: Importance of Partnership Working

External Organizations

The partnership. Aravind has with global entities like WHO goes a long way in scaling up the outreach programs. Such partnerships allow the pooling in of international funding and technical support by which treatment for millions of patients in rural areas would be possible (WHO, 2012). Thus, by pooling resources together, Aravind’s output would be increased without overburdening the internal resources.

Other Practitioners

The partnerships with other practitioners encourage knowledge and skill sharing, thereby equipping Aravind’s workforce to handle complex cases. Such professional collaborations raise overall care quality and quicken the pace at which innovative surgical techniques are adopted (Agarwal et al., 2020).

Colleagues

Teamwork within Aravind is very crucial in the delivery of service with efficiency and safety. Appropriate communication and trust amongst colleagues improve patient outcomes, reduce errors, and facilitate expeditious problem-solving. The partnership will enhance staff morale and job satisfaction, raising the quality of care for patients (Singhal and Greiner, 2022).

Service Users

By including the patients in the decisions, Aravind increases both their participation and compliance. The very act of engaging the patient in planning their care engenders satisfaction, but more importantly, better health outcomes since the care provided is just so specific for that particular preference and condition (Singhal and Greiner, 2022).

Families

Family involvement is crucial for long-term success in patient recovery. Working closely with the families allows Aravind to ensure that patients are getting the emotional and practical support they need once they leave the hospital, which helps to improve recovery rates while reducing the number of readmissions (McPeake et al., 2020).

Part D: Overcoming Barriers to Partnership Working

Despite the advantages that could be elicited from partnership working, there are some common barriers, including breakdown in communication, lack of shared goals, and cultural differences between stakeholders.

• Overcoming these barriers at Aravind includes:
• Establishing clear communication channels with external partners as well as staff.
• Aligning the mission and goals with all stakeholders, ensuring that the focus remains on patient-centered care.
• Providing cultural sensitivity training to staff regarding working respectfully with local and international partners (Weeks, 2021).

Part E: Dealing with Conflict in Partnership Working

Conflicts arise in every organization due to a difference in priorities, resource allocation, or a breakdown in communication. Aravind Eye Hospital has demonstrated how to deal with the conflict management issue through:

• Mediation and Dialogue: Encouraging open discussions among all parties to address disagreements early on.
• Clear Protocols: Having clear guidelines for conflict resolution, ensuring that any disputes are resolved constructively without affecting service quality.
• Shared Goals: It reduces conflict by refocusing on shared goals of quality eye care and helps to keep all the partners channeled in the right direction toward that goal (Amsler, Martinez and Smith, 2020).

Conclusion

Hence, partnership working can help ensure high-quality, efficient health care services are provided to the Aravind Eye Hospital. By working in partnership with external organizations, other practitioners, colleagues, patients, and their families, the hospital influences service provision and the challenge of avoidable blindness in India and beyond.

Overcoming these barriers and conflicts assures these partnerships of sustainability in growth and improvements in healthcare for millions of patients.

Health sciences and medicine (Task 2)

Introduction

The partnership-working with professionals, volunteers, carers, and family members in health and social care is very important in providing person-centered and holistic care. Such kind of partnership lays maximum use of expertise and resources by different stakeholders in realizing the best outcomes for the individual in need of care.

Working relationships are therefore an inherent part of attaining shared objectives like the improvement of patient outcomes to enhance delivery of care and organizational efficiency. This essay provides an analysis of the importance of working relationships in health and social care by assessing procedures for partnership working.

Analyzing common objectives, discussing the contribution of learners to these partnerships, assessing individual strengths and weaknesses in partnership working, identifying ways in which practice may be improved, and outlining methods that can be used to review the effectiveness of partnerships in achieving agreed outcomes (El Osta et al., 2023).

This essay explains how considering these aspects can help in clearly establishing that collaboration is necessary for bringing out the quality health and social care services.

Partnerships in Health and Social Care

Partnerships in health and social care are vital to ensure effectiveness of service delivery, especially within environments that are usually intricate and dynamic, consisting of a wide variety of stakeholders. Direct collaboration with professionals, volunteers, carers, and family members ensures an integrated approach in providing care with resources and expertise for different various individual needs (Skinner et al., 2021).

This essay writing will assess procedures for effective working relationships, analyze common objectives, explain personal contributions to partnership working, evaluate personal strengths and weaknesses, and describe ways to improve practice. Furthermore, it will discuss the ways in which the effectiveness of partnerships is reviewed in achieving agreed outcomes.

Effective working relationships in health and social care rely on clarity in communication, defined roles, and mutual respect. The most important procedures in establishing and continuing the mentioned above relationships are that both parties should understand who is responsible for what and how they view and contribute to the collective goal.

That can be reached, for instance, through regular meetings where roles and expectations inside them are explained and discussed; it is important that issues are shown and brought up in the open (Aunger, Millar and Greenhalgh, 2021). For example, Aravind Eye Hospital has a systematic communication format that enables ophthalmologists, optometrists, nurses, and support staff to communicate effectively.

The members work in care provider teams where regular briefings ensure that all are informed about the treatment objectives for each patient. There is also inter-professional collaboration policy, such as shared case management systems, that allow not only the best transfer of information about the patient but also the avoidance of errors and continuity in treatment.

Another important process is conflict resolution. Partnerships often face challenges due to the difference in priorities or ways (Vankatesh, 2020). A clearly defined conflict resolution process ensures that disagreements will not affect the quality of care. For instance, in Aravind, there is an escalation hierarchy where conflicts are not able to be resolved at a team level; a neutral party mediates, if necessary (Roy  and Janardhanan, 2024).

This fosters a culture of collaboration where different opinions are respected but handled constructively in health sciences and medicine.

Common Objectives of Partnerships

Common goals for health and social care partnerships revolve around the aspiration to deliver quality, person-centered care. Common goals include improving patient outcomes, ensuring patient safety, and promoting organizational efficiency. For each of these respective roles – healthcare professional, volunteer, or carer – contribution is made to these various objectives.

For example, at Aravind, an ophthalmic care centre, the shared vision of eradicating avoidable blindness is translated into highly structured collaboration between full-time clinical teams and part-time administrative and community outreach workers.

Each group works within a specified role or function in service of the larger mission: ophthalmologists perform surgery, nurses care for patients before and after surgery, and volunteers work on patient education and counseling. By sharing these goals, each group can rest assured that they will make a valuable contribution toward the mission of the hospital.

In order to be sure these goals are met, collaboration and shared goals have to be addressed and communicated each day (Minnies, 2020).

Individual contribution

As learners and professionals in the health and social care sectors, the contribution to improving partnership working becomes considerable. The key areas of contribution toward the same involve proactive communication and engagement with all parties and stakeholders concerned.   

Another way of creating involvement is through full participation within the team regarding discussions and decision-making processes, hence giving rise to a culture of inclusivity and shared responsibility (Konings, 2021)

Evaluating Strengths and Weaknesses

It is very important to assess one’s own strengths and weaknesses with regard to partnership working. A strong point regarding partnership could involve excellent communication skills, which are bound to foster clarity and understanding in the articulation of ideas from one member to another in health sciences and medicine.

Clear articulation, coupled with active listening, combined with appropriate response to feedback given, serves to enhance collaboration in the process of trust-building among partners (Alfonso et al., 2024). On the other hand, one’s weakness may be unwillingness to delegate or ask for help when necessary.

When working in a team, it is always advisable to know when others are best suited to perform a particular function. Not sharing work or problems with others leads to burnout and inefficiency in delivering services. Such weakness will be overcome by trusting others and understanding that partnership working is all about shared responsibility (Maslach and Leiter, 2022).

Partnership Monitoring and Improvement

Partnership working requires continuous effort in reflecting and working on areas of weakness in practice main. For example, regarding the area of weakness identified not allowing others to function enough, there is a need to enhance the leadership skills alongside strengthening the relationships between fellow professionals.

Trust can only be built, for example through team building and projects that allow individuals to derive confidence in other people’s capabilities, thus allowing them to think it is easier to delegate tasks to others. In addition, mentorship from practitioners with experience in the field would be an added advantage to tutors and students on how to work in partnership. Learning through mentors who have navigated even the most complex partnership settings can offer pragmatic approaches to overcoming barriers and ways of influencing collaborative improvement (NHS UK, 2022).

Their effectiveness has to be reviewed regularly in ensuring partnerships achieve the intended outcomes through performance evaluations, patient outcome reviews, and feedback from stakeholders. Levels of patient satisfaction, measures of efficiency, and staff feedback are all part of key performance indicators that define the effectiveness of partnerships.

For example, patients giving critical feedback would be one way to show the effectiveness of partnership at Aravind Eye Hospital. Data on patients’ experiences of care and suggestions are routinely elicited, which informs the development of the hospital’s strategies to partner with them. In addition to this, regular team reviews provide an opportunity to determine whether partnerships are venuring to achieve the intended clinical results related to reducing avoidable blindness (Anderson et al., 2021).

By overseeing partnership working, an organization can make informed decisions on where improvements are required and how best to enhance collaborative efforts.

Conclusion

Partnership working in health and social care can achieve the provision of well-rounded and quality care. Partnerships, through clarity about the objectives of each agency and constant evaluation could achieve better patient outcomes and more efficient modalities of providing a service.

As professional in the area of work, there is a requirement for consistently evaluating and improving our own contribution to partnership working, ensuring that we are active in developing relationships that promote collaboration. In this way, health and social care providers will be able to further develop their partnership working by regular reviews of its effectiveness, thus enabling them to offer even higher quality care to the individuals they serve.

Health sciences and medicine (Task 3)

Management Report-NHS UK

Introduction

The revitalization of health care demands that organizations like the National Health Service of the UK continually reevaluate and expand services to meet not only the growing but also the changing needs of patients. To date, NHS UK has blended the philosophy of person-centered care with innovation and entrepreneurial thinking in its approaches so that the services provided remain effective, accessible, and adaptable (Paton, 2022).

In this Assignment report, one will examine aspects of NHS UK no longer effective in light of providing person-centered care; explore avenues of growth and development based on collaboration; present a plan that describes how the culture will be maintained in such a way that it will continue to support innovation and growth.

Loopholes in Providing Person-Centred Service

While the NHS UK is known for universal healthcare, its service delivery model has a number of components that no longer support effective person-centered care. One of the primary components concerns the long waiting times for non-urgent care. This predominantly affects patients, who have to wait for several months sometimes and years to undergo elective surgeries and consultations with specialists, forcing a reduction in person-centeredness in care due to the delay in treatment; this makes patients’ satisfaction poor (Fernandes and Ray, 2023).

Overreliance on face-to-face consultations is yet another factor impeding the job of timely and flexible care. As technology in digital health continues to enhance, many routine consultations could take place via telemedicine, easing life for both the patient and relieving pressure on services. In not embracing the full potential of digital health solution improvement within secondary care, the NHS UK is losing out on the opportunity to ensure more accessible and appropriate care to meet modern patient needs (Shen et al., 2021).

Last but not least, there is still fragmentation in care coordination between departments. Many patients report fragmented care due to a lack of communication between specialists and general practitioners. Such lack of integration thus leads to inefficiencies and inconsistency in patient experiences, further detracting from the person-centered approach that is valued so much in the NHS UK(Damarell, Morgan and Tieman, 2020).

Opportunities for Growth and Development

The NHS UK has to collaborate with other organizations and stakeholders in extending its service provision and meeting the needs of its patients more appropriately. One significant opportunity for expansion in the operation is that of public-private partnerships, especially in handling long waiting lists for elective procedures.

If the less critical surgeries and treatments are outsourced from private providers, the NHS UK will have the chance to reduce patient wait times and allow the focussed group to the delivery of its services in emergency and acute care. Such a partnership would provide expertise and resources from outside with the core values of the NHS UK intact. Moreover, the partnership with the technology firms would modernize the service provided by the NHS UK (Fletcher et al., 2024).(Working in partnership in health and social care)

Digital health tools-for example, artificial intelligence diagnostics, remote monitoring systems, and telehealth platforms-would facilitate the NHS UK in delivering speedy and efficient health care services. For example, a potential introduction of AI-based diagnostic support tools into the general practice might alleviate some of the pressure on GPs to allow them to divert more attention to complicated cases while AI performs routine assessments. Another opportunity is for developing cooperation with community organizations.

The local health boards, charities, and patient advocacy groups have much to offer in providing insight into specific local needs to inform the design of responsive services offered by the NHS UK (Panejer, 2023). The key to inclusive, equitable service delivery by the NHS UK rests with these partnerships.

Maintaining Innovation, Change, and Growth

Innovation and Change The NHS UK needs a culture that would normatively embrace innovation and change constantly to continue with better healthcare provision. This should be offered through promoting continuous professional development. Encouragement towards staff for keeping them updated with the latest developments in medical technology and patient care should be provided (Holti and Storey, 2021).

The leaders should create an enabling environment for experimentation of new methods and technology through pilot initiatives that test novel models of care delivery. Second, clear communication of the need for change, along with the benefits accruing thereof, is necessary.

Involvement of staff from all levels in the process of change serves to minimize resistance while creating a sense of ownership and shared responsibility in organizational growth and improvement (Errida and Lotfi, 2021).

Employees Recognition

The NHS UK is very fortunate to possess such a talent pool in terms of skill and expertise within its staff. Sustaining this through a culture of growth means that this expertise needs to be recognized and utilized. Encouraging cross-departmental collaboration and sharing knowledge amongst the staff will ensure that silos are reduced and best practices are shared at all levels.

For instance, professionals from different specializations working together on the care of a patient can enhance better outcomes because of the more holistic treatment approach. The NHS UK should also engage proactively with the service users themselves in order to integrate their feedback into service design (Taberna et al., 2020).

Patients and their families are great informants on how services can be improved. Regular surveys, focus groups, and patient advisory panels will go a long way in providing insight into how to improve the patient experience (Minen et al., 2020).

Entrepreneurial Skills for coping Future Demand

The demand for health care services is going up, especially those pertaining to adults. For the survival of the NHS UK, it implies that the need to apply entrepreneurial skills is urgent as well as inevitable. Entrepreneurial thinking involves identifying the emerging trends in health care, such as the increasing importance of digital health, personalized medicine, and prevention.

By leading the trends, in response, the NHS UK is able to design services responsive to the needs of their future patients while being cost-effective (Dowling, 2022). Moreover, entrepreneurship in skills would enable the NHS UK to identify new revenue streams. Conclusively, the fundamental principle of free health care would remain intact, but providing private, premium services or specialized treatments to those able and willing to pay for them could generate additional income that can be reinvested in the public healthcare services.

This would ensure that the NHS UK is adequately resourced to carry on caring for all members of the public with quality (Ghanbarzadegan et al., 2021).

Conclusion

The extension of service provision within NHS UK requires a comprehensive review of its present practice and pledges for collaboration, innovation, and entrepreneurial thinking. Taking the inefficiencies of the system into account-long waiting times and fragmentation in the coordination of care-the NHS UK will not stop offering high-quality.

Person-centered care if it opens its arms to partnership with private providers, technology companies, and community organizations. In addition, the cultural impression of growth and expertise from both staff and patients will, in turn, be imperative for the NHS UK to maintain a flexible character toward the fluctuating demands of the market.

Whether you’re exploring the concept of Working in Partnership in Health and Social Care or looking for tools like “check my assignment” to streamline your academic work, having the right resources makes all the difference.

References(Working in partnership in health and social care)

Health sciences and medicine (Task 1)

Agarwal, N., Chakrabarti, R., Prabhu, J.C. and Brem, A., 2020. Managing dilemmas of resource mobilization through jugaad: A multi‐method study of social enterprises in Indian healthcare. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(3), pp.419-443.

Amsler, L.B., Martinez, J. and Smith, S.E., 2020. Dispute system design: Preventing, managing, and resolving conflict. Stanford University Press.

Balu, G.B.S., Gupta, S., Ravilla, R.D., Ravilla, T.D., Mertens, H., Webers, C., Rao, S.V. and van Merode, F., 2023. Impact of practicing internal benchmarking on continuous improvement of cataract surgery outcomes: A retrospective observational study at Aravind Eye Hospitals, India. BMJ open, 13(6), p.e071860.

Keerthana, K.R., Subramanian, B., Khanna, R., Sundaram, N., Jain, A. and Raman, R., 2024. Using Resources from India to Increase Productivity to Impact Global Health. In Advances in Vision Research, Volume IV: From Basic to Translational Research—Developing Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Genetic Eye Diseases (pp. 329-335). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Krishnaveni, G., Joseph, S. and Thulasiraj, R., 2023. Uptake pattern of training programs over two decades at an International Ophthalmic Training Institute in India. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(1), pp.268-274.

Lu, F., Chen, W., Li, M., Zhou, X. and Qu, J., 2021. From establishing a world-renowned eye institute to integrating ophthalmology and optometry in China: the story of the eye hospital of wenzhou medical university. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, 10(2), pp.135-141.

McPeake, J., Boehm, L.M., Hibbert, E., Bakhru, R.N., Bastin, A.J., Butcher, B.W., Eaton, T.L., Harris, W., Hope, A.A., Jackson, J. and Johnson, A., 2020. Key components of ICU recovery programs: what did patients report provided benefit?. Critical care explorations, 2(4), p.e0088.

Nayak, J.S., James, T.T., Menaria, S. and Dhargave, P., 2023. PP-07_141. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 29(2), p.106.

Singhal, A. and Greiner, K., 2022. Using the Positive Deviance approach to reduce hospital-acquired infections at the Veterans Administration Healthcare System in Pittsburgh 1. In Leading Change in Healthcare (pp. 177-209). CRC Press.

Weeks, K.R., 2021. Exploring the nexus of patient safety and patient-centered care: a study of high performing hospitals (Doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University).

World Health Organization, 2012. Research and development to meet health needs in developing countries: strengthening global financing and coordination: report of the consultative expert working group on research and development: financing and coordination. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization, 2022. Guide to applying the WHO eye care competency framework. World Health Organization.

Health sciences and medicine (Task 2)

Alfonso, C.M., Barañao, E.L., Layno, V.W.T., Soriano, A.J.A., Tuquib, K.D.V. and Lester Jr, T.V., 2024. The lived experiences of occupational therapists in building trust with their patients. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(5), pp.758-786.

Anderson, N.N., Baker, G.R., Moody, L., Scane, K., Urquhart, R., Wodchis, W.P. and Gagliardi, A.R., 2021. Approaches to optimize patient and family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: qualitative interviews. Health Expectations, 24(3), pp.967-977.

Aunger, J.A., Millar, R. and Greenhalgh, J., 2021. When trust, confidence, and faith collide: refining a realist theory of how and why inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work. BMC health services research, 21(1), p.602.

El-Osta, A., Smith, P., Leyns, C.C., Steenfeldt-Foss, O.W. and Webber, D., 2023. Empowerment of community members. In Person Centered Medicine (pp. 687-702). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

England, N.H.S., 2022. Working in partnership with people and communities: statutory guidance. Care DoHS.

Könings, K.D., Mordang, S., Smeenk, F., Stassen, L. and Ramani, S., 2021. Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Medical teacher, 43(8), pp.924-936.

Maslach, C. and Leiter, M.P., 2022. The burnout challenge: Managing people’s relationships with their jobs. Harvard University Press.

Minnies, D., 2020. The graduates of the Postgraduate Diploma in Community Eye Health: how do they manage?.

Roy, V.I. and Janardhanan, K.A., 2024. DYNAMICS OF CONFLICTS MANAGEMENT IN COLLEGES. DYNAMICS, 22(01).(working in partnership in health and social care)

Skinner, M.S., Lorentzen, H., Tingvold, L., Sortland, O., Andfossen, N.B. and Jegermalm, M., 2021. Volunteers and informal caregivers’ contributions and collaboration with formal caregivers in Norwegian long-term care. Journal of aging & social policy, 33(6), pp.647-672.

Venkatesh, N., 2020. Ophthalmic practice protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic–the Aravind way. Eye Health, 33(109), p.38.

Health sciences and medicine (Task 3)

Damarell, R.A., Morgan, D.D. and Tieman, J.J., 2020. General practitioner strategies for managing patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research. BMC Family Practice, 21, pp.1-23.

Dowling, E., 2022. The care crisis: What caused it and how can we end it?. Verso Books.

Errida, A. and Lotfi, B., 2021. The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13, p.18479790211016273.(working in partnership in health and social care).

Fernandes, A. and Ray, J., 2023. Improving the safety and effectiveness of urgent and emergency care. Future Healthcare Journal, 10(3), pp.195-204.

Fletcher, S., Eddama, O., Anderson, M., Meacock, R., Wattal, V., Allen, P. and Peckham, S., 2024. The impact of NHS UK outsourcing of elective care to the independent sector on outcomes for patients, healthcare professionals and the United Kingdom health care system: A rapid narrative review of literature. Health Policy, p.105166.

Ghanbarzadegan, A., Balasubramanian, M., Luzzi, L., Brennan, D. and Bastani, P., 2021. Inequality in dental services: a scoping review on the role of access toward achieving universal health coverage in oral health. BMC Oral Health, 21, pp.1-11.

Holti, R. and Storey, J., 2020. Innovating Healthcare. Routledge.

Minen, M.T., Morio, K., Schaubhut, K.B., Powers, S.W., Lipton, R.B. and Seng, E., 2020. Focus group findings on the migraine patient experience during research studies and ideas for future investigations. Cephalalgia, 40(7), pp.712-734.

Panejar, A., 2023. Precision health and artificial intelligence. Nueva York: Apress.

Paton, C., 2022. NHS UK reform and health politics in the UK: revolution, counter-revolution and Covid crisis. Springer Nature.

Shen, Y.T., Chen, L., Yue, W.W. and Xu, H.X., 2021. Digital technology-based telemedicine for the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in medicine, 8, p.646506.

Taberna, M., Gil Moncayo, F., Jané-Salas, E., Antonio, M., Arribas, L., Vilajosana, E., Peralvez Torres, E. and Mesía, R., 2020. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach and quality of care. Frontiers in oncology, 10, p.85.(Working in partnership in health and social care).