Assignment Writer

info@assignmentwriter.net

Assignment Writer
Assignment Writer
Home / Free Samples / Holland and Rees Critiquing Framework

Holland and Rees Critiquing Framework: Evidence-Based Practice

Holland and Rees Critiquing Framework

 

Holland and Rees Critiquing Framework: Evidence-Based Practice

Critiquing articles is a crucial part of research study. Holland and Rees critiquing framework has emerged as a tool to critically evaluate articles to ensure qualitative research and quantitative research. Nursing research, engineering research, science research, or any other; this framework functions for any kind of data collection.

Care Certificate Standard Answers

Holland and Rees Critiquing Research Process

Everyone would agree that there is a need to appraise critically. It enables professionals to evaluate the relevance, reliability, and validity of research before it is applied to clinical decision-making. Roger Rees and Karen Holland developed this framework for critiquing quantitative and qualitative research papers. It is similar to the Caldwell, Henshaw, and Taylor framework which is used for research questions and research methods.

An important case to be studied is that of a student named Breshna Shah. She was tasked to critique the flaws in research along with its ethical considerations. She utilized Holland and Rees tool to identify both qualitative and quantitative researches. Breshna mapped out the inclusion and exclusion criteria and helped develop tips for undergraduate nursing students. This helped newcomers realize how they should write research papers. This was a hallmark performance and Breshna was well-applauded for that.

Similar to Breshna, there are many students in the hunt for a tool. They are not aware of the wonders Holland and Rees critiquing framework has achieved. The tool is gaining academic significance not just in niche circles but in the overall community of researchers. This means the hard work of Holland and Rees is relevant to date.

Critiquing Qualitative and Quantitative Future Research

Critiquing quantitative research studies and qualitative research studies is essential for nursing students – or others – especially when it comes to dissertation writing. Research articles, quantitative studies, qualitative studies, quantitative research articles, qualitative research articles, or any statistical analysis can be covered through this framework.

The primary purpose is to ensure collection methods are accurate enough for data analysis. The Holland and Rees tool is one of those tools used for analysing strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative studies. Even health professionals use this tool to incorporate effective strategies to reduce the quantity of academic errors and better their health services.

This framework helps you develop a convincing descriptive analysis. It evaluates the quality of the published paper as well as its scoping review. The collection of data through previous studies is made sure as it results in a better quality.

Holland and Rees critiquing tool is considered as good as the Caldwell tool for the same purpose. We can fairly say that Holland and Rees have done something helpful and grand for academia. This tool was a necessity of time and it was developed well.

Critical Analysis in Data Collection Methods

All kinds of data collection methods must be validated. You need to confirm how accurate the collected sampling is as well as its usefulness. The peer reviewed body of knowledge and meta-analysis is necessary, especially for the medical discipline. Health nurses must be given precise information on how they should act and it is possible only when the research is criticized and approved.

Student nurses must be taught to use this tool well so they can extract information on their own like that. The study indicates shortcomings in research and the tips needed to remove those pitfalls and progress well along the way. This assures the legitimacy of positive results, and only this kind of research can help you develop practical tips.

The resolution in the study is identified well this way. Proper material is gained this way as useless or erroneous stuff is filtered out and the research is done well. Many experts have reviewed this tool, and according to them, this is one of the finest tools to critique research. Finally, Holland and Rees critiquing framework is worth their hassle as many across the globe continue to use it for their research.

Care Certificate Answers

References

Abbott, M.L., 2016. Using statistics in the health and social sciences with excel and SPSS. John Wiley & Sons.

Agarwal, R., Jain, P., Ghosh, M.S. and Parihar, K.S., 2017. Significance of primary health care in the society. International journal of health sciences, 1(1), pp.6-11.

Alimohammadian, M., Majidi, A., Yaseri, M., Ahmadi, B., Islami, F., Derakhshan, M., Delavari, A., Amani, M., Feyz-Sani, A., Poustchi, H. and Pourshams, A., 2017. Multimorbidity as a crucial issue among women: Results of a gender difference investigation in a large population-based cross-sectional study in West Asia. BMJ open, 7(5), p.e013548.

Campbell, M.M., Susser, E., Mall, S., Mqulwana, S.G., Mndini, M.M., Ntola, O.A., Nagdee, M., Zingela, Z., Van Wyk, S. and Stein, D.J., 2017. Using iterative learning to enhance understanding during the informed consent process in a South African psychiatric genomics study. PLoS One, 12(11), p.e0188466.

Cooper, C., Booth, A., Varley-Campbell, J., Britten, N. and Garside, R., 2018. Defining the procedure to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies. BMC medical research methodology, 18(1), p.85.

Hutchings, E., Loomes, M., Butow, P. and Boyle, F.M., 2020. A systematic literature review of health consumer attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on privacy, trust, and transparency. Systematic Reviews, 9(1), pp.1-41.

Kavanaugh, M.L., Zolna, M.R. and Burke, K.L., 2018. Use of health insurance among clients seeking contraceptive services at Title X–funded facilities in 2016. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 50(3), pp.101-109.

Leijten, P., Gardner, F., Landau, S., Harris, V., Mann, J., Hutchings, J., Beecham, J., Bonin, E.M. and Scott, S., 2018. Research Review: Harnessing the power of individual participant data in a meta‐analysis of the benefits and harms of the Incredible Years parenting program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(2), pp.99-109.

McKenna, L. and Gray, R., 2018. The importance of ethics in research publications. Collegian, 25(2), pp.147-148.

Mohesh, G., Murugappan, S. and Meerasa, S.S., 2018. A Cross-sectional Descriptive Study to Assess the Knowledge, Attitude and Practices towards Voluntary Participation in Health Research among the Medical Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Physiology, 5(3), pp.151-155.

Moore, S. and Kawachi, I., 2017. Twenty years of social capital and health research: a glossary. J Epidemiol Community Health, 71(5), pp.513-517.

Perry, L., Lamont, S., Brunero, S., Gallagher, R. and Duffield, C., 2015. The mental health of nurses in acute teaching hospital settings: a cross-sectional survey. BMC nursing, 14(1), p.15.

seslhd 2019, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee, Available at: https://www.seslhd.health.nsw.gov.au/services-clinics/directory/research-home/ethics 

Sibbald, S.L., Kang, H. and Graham, I.D., 2019. Collaborative health research partnerships: a survey of researcher and knowledge-user attitudes and perceptions. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1), p.92.

Steffl, M., Sima, J., Shiells, K. and Holmerova, I., 2017. The increase in health care costs associated with muscle weakness in older people without long-term illnesses in the Czech Republic: results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Clinical Interventions in Aging, 12, p.2003.

Vives, A., Benmarhnia, T., González, F. and Benach, J., 2020. The importance of using a multi-dimensional scale to capture the various impacts of precarious employment on health: results from a national survey of Chilean workers. PloS one, 15(9), p.e0238401.

Von Rosen, A.J., von Rosen, F.T., Tinnemann, P. and Müller-Riemenschneider, F., 2017. Sexual health and the internet: cross-sectional study of online preferences among adolescents. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(11), p.e379.

Related Posts

Related Samples

No Plagiarism | No AI A+ Grade Guaranteed

×
User Name
Guest
Start as guest

No Plagiarism | No AI A+ Grade Guaranteed

Submit The Form To Read Complete Answers